Sunday, 18 December 2016

OUGD601 - Primary Research Responses



OUGD601 - Primary Research Responses



Response 1


Malcolm Barnard, Author and Theorist in Visual Culture

Barnard, M. 17th December (2016)


What do you think drives design forward? 

What do you think drives design forward? 
This assumes that there is a ‘forward’ and that we know, or someone knows, what it is. I don’t think there is a ‘forward', in the sense of progress towards something better or ideal. Mostly what drives design is capital and capitalism, and capitalism has a very limited and specific understanding of what ‘forward’ means. It means a very few people making money out of a lot of other people, with all the divisions and inequalities that follow. 



What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design?

What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design? 
Which principles? Principles tend to come in and out of fashion and enjoy different statuses at different times. So ‘form follows function’ might be a principle (do you think it is a principle?) and it will be in and out of fashion at different times. It will be in fashion in some areas of architecture at some times, (Bauhaus, 1920s, for example), and out of fashion in other areas at other times (anything by Gaultier, for example). 




Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?

Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design? 
What are rules? Are they different from principles? Do you mean what Rick Poynor means by rules? Of course, there are always things which people will identify and promote as rules and the point of design education is to learn what they are in your time and place, so you know whether, when and why you might break them. In this sense, they are like principles, coming in and going out of fashion, and you can treat them similarly – know what they are so that you know whether, when and why to break them.








Response 2


Peter Hall, Design Writer

Hall, P. 15th December (2016)


What do you think drives design forward? 

Economy; Desire for societal/environmental/cultural change; Desire for celebrity 



Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?

Yes; the reference to "no more rules" is to an outdated idea of a design profession & practice. Rules are governed by various cultural regimes and are constantly being tested & renegotiated 








Response 3


Steven Heller, Author, Art Director, Critic and Journalist

Heller, S. 15th December (2016) 





What do you think drives design forward? 

That’s a big question because EVERTHING design touches is an influence in what drives design. The major drivers are economy, politics, culture, technology, and to put it briefly NEED. Add to that the aesthetics that emerge. 




What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design?

Standards of quality always remain constant but those of taste (i.e. style) change with the spin of the earth. 



Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?

There are always rules to break, because there are always rules to make. Total freedom never exists in a vacuum. 








Response 4


Zoe Patterson, Programme Director of Graphic Design at University of Edinburgh 




Patterson, Z. 21st Decemeber (2016)


What do you think drives design forward? 

Risk takers. Unique collaborations. Creative people in unusual positions – within unexpected places such as NHS, banking etc. Parameters and restrictions. Experimentation. 



What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design?

I believe the old adage of learning the rules/principles to break them is still relevant. GD has less of a history within Art and Design so it needs these rules to underpin the discipline. Gives the subject more authority.



Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?

Of course. They are not necessarily aesthetic rules as fashions come and go but perceptions and responding to contemporary life are massively open to interpretation and exploration. As the world develops so should the designer’s idea of a rule and what breaking it means. 








Response 5

Mike Inglis, Practicing Artist and Lecturer of Graphic Design at University of Edinburgh

Inglis, M. 15th Decemeber (2016) 




What do you think drives design forward? 

Innovation sometimes / technology sometimes / anger sometimes / idealism sometimes / utopianism mostly.



What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design?

Principles in design - underlying fundamental and established approaches or rules are always present in design usually in process if not end result. but this is a huge area of discussion and I'm not too sue what aspect your interested in discussing.





Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?

Students are obsessed with rules or breaking them - I don't care about this anymore although I did when I was in your position -it goes with the territory I guess when being constantly judged or marked or assessed. i only care about the purity of the visual communication and its success in messaging - for instance contemporary trends in stretching type and including digitised obscure imaging is only a through back to the deconstruction movement of the early nineties (David Carson etc.) - most of it is interesting but I'm not sure its contributing a great deal other than to the visual language its adding to. more interesting to me is designers rejecting mainstream working patterns or social norms to push for a fairer society or an alternative to the current state of capitalism that we have all been complicit in creating is the real rule breaking I'm interested in.





Response 6


Clinton Cahill, Senor Lecturer of Graphic Design at Manchester School of Art

Cahill, C. 15th Decemeber (2016)


What do you think drives design forward? 

Technology (not just digital technology), innovation - the desire to just do new things or old things differently, creative play, youth.





What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design?

I've never really understood or bought into the idea of design principles. They are too often dogmatic or used as a way of pretending that creative curiosity can be readily and easily taught and applied. They should always be questioned. Many bad things in the world have been made by simply following design principles and designed principles. 



Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?

We don't seem to break as many rules as we used to - in some ways the design climate has become quite conservative and less permissible. Look how safe illustrative imagery has become. But this is also linked to question 1. Design (like any creative field) must always seek to unfold beyond parameters set for it. Just because a rule is broken in one era doesn't mean that it will not reappear in another. Perhaps you should look at what you mean by rules and think about who sets them and why? Are they societal, professional, aesthetic? How creative might designing rules be? What are your own personal boundaries - who wouldn't you work for, what wouldn't you depict or say through your design? Shock may be a cliched manoeuvre in design, but sentimentality or intellectualism might be interesting to look at.







 Response 7


Dr Jamie Marsden, Lecteur of Graphic Design at University of Leeds


Marsden, J. 15th Decemebr (2016)


What do you think drives design forward? 

Design, in a generic sense, is mostly driven by needs, which are subject to continual change.



What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design?

Depends on context. Depends upon who places value on design principles (i.e., designer, client, audience, society).


Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?

Principles of ‘good’ design are a framework, not a straight-jacket. The adherence to principles would surely depend upon the aim of the design.






Response 8


Professor M. A. Hann, Chair of Design Theory at University of Leeds

Hann, M. 15th Decemeber (2016)


What do you think drives design forward? 

Consumer demand.


What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design?

Low status. 


Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?

Loads.





Response 9


Ryan Doyle, Founder of Graphic Design Studio - DR.ME

Doyle, R. 15th December (2016)


What do you think drives design forward? 

Fresh ideas and new approaches to design, design changes rapidly all the time due to a number of factors, technology advancements, cultural changes, and design can also seem dated very quickly so the need to constantly think of new ideas and techniques is forever pushing design forward and into unknown territory.




What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design?

I think there is still design sensibility within contemporary design but I feel more and more people are starting to reject what is the “right way to design” and creating there own set of design principles. 




Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?

Always. 






Response 10  


Alec Dudson, Editor-In-Chief and Founder of Intern Magazine



Dudson, A. 16th December (2016)


What do you think drives design forward? 

Tough one, I think for different designers there are different influences. Anyone can influence the industry in turn so this could become a bit of a wormhole (I’m sure you’ve got it covered though). Two big factors for me are technological advances and youth culture. New processes and possibilities encourage designers to experiment with what was previously outside the bounds of possibility, or at the very least, was difficult or complicated before. As long as we live in a capitalist society, youth culture will have a big influence on design as young people are a highly desirable customer base. As such, design often looks to second-guess and respond to trends that they are catalysts for. 



What do you think the status is of design principles in contemporary design?

Again, it’s tough to answer as different designers have different principles and reverence for principles. Undoubtedly though, in the last five years the most popular principles have been that of minimalism and simplicity. I often hear it described as clean design. Like anything though, when it becomes so widely used, there becomes a point at which it loses agency. There are already designers who eschew that approach and go in a completely different direction, some with great success (Kate Moross). I think that we’ll see that minimal approach go back out of fashion at some point soon, I’m just not sure when.



Do you think there are anymore ‘rules' left to break within design?


I guess so, but they’re probably relatively unspoken rules. Recently it’s been technological advances that have shaken up things more than stylistic innovation. 3D printing is a good example here of something which has allowed people to design things with a material that they previously couldn’t or would have had to produce on mass scale. Visually speaking, it’s certainly becoming harder to create work that doesn’t reference something that’s gone before, but as ever, we’re creatures of our environment. The last big set of design rules came about in part due to the new material process and built environment that emerged. Imagine modernist or minimalist visual culture without concrete, fibreglass and steam bent plywood! A copy of Kinfolk/Cereal would look a whole lot different, believe me.

Saturday, 17 December 2016

OUGD601 - Steven Heller 'Me feral Designer'


Steven Heller - 'Me Feral Designer'


Heller, S. (2005) Me feral designer. Available at: http://www.eyemagazine.com/opinion/article/me-feral-designer (Accessed: 15 December 2016).


I’m a recovering self-taught designer. After more than 30 years I have finally come to the realisation that my self-education was like a dormant childhood illness that has returned in adult life to haunt me. For years I smugly admitted that I had never attended a graphic design class (except those I taught), was expelled from The School of Visual Arts (where in the late 1960s I was enrolled in the illustration department and barely attended) and learnt everything ostensibly on my jobs (I was ‘hired’ right out of high school as a layout designer / art director for an underground newspaper and moved on from there). Me be proud primitive, with limited skills and limitless ambition.
Ambition masked many deficiencies, thus validating my belief that formal design training would have been a colossal waste of time. Yet being a feral designer had its drawbacks, even then. As in the case of a foreign-speaking immigrant who was never properly taught the tongue of his new land and is consequently stuck in linguistic infancy, my design language lacked sturdy foundations. I was never taught the grammar of type or precepts of design. Rather, I acquired stylistic conceits – what might be called design pidgin. My instincts served me well, but ultimately instinct failed to sustain design intelligence. Even practice, practice, practice was insufficient over the long haul, because I had been practising all wrong. Passion is useful, but justifying decisions to others solely on the basis of ‘It feels good’ extends only so far before one is labelled a dithering nabob of emotional excess.
Formal education does not, however, replace instinct and passion with rote and reflexive methods. What it does is provide tools for harnessing those enigmatic traits. Formal education imparts standards of competency, and being competent is difficult enough even with the benefit of good teachers or savvy computer templates.
A feral designer can survive for a while on pure guile, but without substantive knowledge (or a very strong creative and / or business collaborator) he or she is likely to be lost in the wilderness feeding on clichés and formulae like so many berries and grubs. Worse, he is probably destined to reinvent the wheel over and over and over, which squanders more energy than it creates. It is, therefore, nonsense to believe that one is more likely to push boundaries in a vacuum than in a classroom. The old maxim about knowing rules in order to break them is actually pretty sound. In fact, a good undergraduate education packs the student’s brain with so many damn rules (and infuriating opinions) that rule-breaking is inevitable.
‘I think the last time ‘self-taught’ worked was [with] Herbert Bayer who claimed, for typography at least, that knowing nothing gave the Bauhaus guys freedom to invent,’ asserts design historian and educator Martha Scotford. ‘It worked for them, briefly, but today that would be naive.’